Brazil’s Crops and Antarctic Ice Expose Climate Corruption – By Vijay Jayaraj – CO2 Coalition – May 9, 2025
I want to feature some important parts of that essay as shared quotes, here…
On Brazil’s record harvests…
The Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics projects cereals, legumes, and oilseeds to reach more than 325 million metric tons of production this year, an 11% increase over 2024.
I suggest that this harvested crop increase may have a basis in the fact of gradually increasing levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. Which would naturally result in such crop increase. This is not a catastrophe. It is a return to normal levels – which should be more than double what we have now, i.e. above 1,000 ppm.
On Antarctic ice rebound…
The IPCC, the supposed gold standard for climate science, has built entire policy frameworks around the assumption of irreversible polar ice loss and inevitable climate collapse from the use of fossil fuels. These frameworks have been adopted wholesale by politicians like Canada’s Mark Carney, England’s Keir Starmer, Australia’s Anthony Albanese, California’s Gavin Newsom and others.
So, what happens when nature refuses to follow their political scripts? Nothing. The policy train keeps moving, fueled by inertia, institutional pride and personal hubris. The crisis is not in our atmosphere. It is in institutions corrupted by groupthink, rent-seeking and lust for power.
Until some measure of integrity is restored to scientific and political leadership, the real catastrophe is the collapse of trust in those designated to protect liberty, engender economic growth and allow for the continued advancement of human civilization.
I also want to add to this evidence, that I have personally noticed a potential ice rebound, or at least a complete stop in the expansion of sea ice melting, occurring in the Arctic region during this decade. This stoppage and rebound (potential only, for the Arctic – won’t be more sure perhaps until the end of the current decade) would naturally be expected if it could be proven that we – this generation of humanity – are witnessing the final phase of the current inter-glacial period. That end-of-warming period, should logically be occurring around about now. The world then heading forward on the gradual downward slope of average global temperature levels (in another 100,000 years or so) to roughly where it was back when modern humans began first emerging from the previous glacial period, following the Younger Dryas event (that would have been about 17,000 years ago).
I have been producing a spreadsheet, a couple of days into each month (next one around June 2nd), for every month since January 2021, comparing the monthly annual average for however many years into the current decade we are (now five years) with the same month of the complete previous decade. What I have said above about cessation of advancement of ice melt in the Arctic Ocean, is borne out by that data. The same data as I use, can also be seen visually on the ‘NSIDC Charctic Interactive Sea Ice Graph‘, which is from where I source it.
While we do not need evidence of our overall gradually cooling world – that is historical fact – to eventually obtain proof that we are no longer in a temporary warming period – which we can already surmise now from both polar regions – will bring an end to the foolish notion of global warming once and for all. Allowing us to then progress to developing means of surviving increasing cold such as was the case when our long distant ancestors first emerged from the warm tropical regions of the Middle East, Africa and perhaps even Central America, to explore what were then still ice-bound parts of the planet, i.e. those we consider now to be the Temperate regions. We never made it, nor will we ever, to inhabit in any meaningful way, the Polar regions.
History doesn’t repeat, but it cycles.
And one of those cycles covers whatever stage the climate may be traversing. If we want to make it on this planet, we’d better get used to that idea. For us, anatomically modern humans of the latest civilisational era (last several thousand years), this is all going to be new territory. A period the likes of which we have never before experienced. A long, slow, cooling period, to which there will be ample time to adjust. And there will always be parts of the planet to which we can migrate, which will not greatly change (Equatorial and Tropical regions), even in the coldest periods, any more than they do now. We know that, because we know that the average global temperature never drops – never has dropped – to much below 10°C. So, while the Polar and Temperate regions will grow to become much colder than they are now, and mostly ice-covered, the Equatorial belt will remain pleasantly warm. I think we can be assured of that. Not that this will affect any of us living now. It is important to realise that too. For us, nothing much will change – for better or worse. And, in future generations, the global population, I expect, will be much smaller. We can see that happening now. In the last several years, growth has slowed. But we cannot allow the obsessively wealthy – those few who own more than half the world’s wealth – and who view us as ‘useless eaters’, to diabolically kill us off, which is their plan, before nature naturally reduces us to an appropriate level, gradually and untold generations down the track. With luck we will make it. After all, our forebears did. And they, modern humans who began to emerge up to perhaps a couple of million years ago, when times were moderately to considerably warmer than today’s temperatures, already have been through similar times as those I expect we will (sorry, our descendants will – it is difficult to maintain perspective across such long periods) be facing in the future.
History (and climate change) also does not shoot off in strange and fantastic directions, as we are constantly being led to believe, by corrupt officials and power-brokers. Except in rare instances when external factors intervene. It, climate change, is a contained and ordered system, operating within set boundaries, as is obvious from a perusal of historically recorded graphical data (covering long durations, not just 150 years or so). It is not possible for the system (and we are part of that system) to generate potential for other than its set paths from its own internal processes (and we are just part of that process). We kid ourselves if we think otherwise.

Leave a comment