Despite what deluded climate alarmists, uninformed parts of the scientific community, governments, international organisations, media and big business are desperately telling us, ad nauseam, Carbon Dioxide (CO2) can not in any way be truthfully referred to as a pollutant which must be removed from our atmosphere and eliminated by hiding it somewhere away from our daily lives because it poses a danger to humanity and other life-forms. Such accusations or threats are simply a blatant lie. Carbon Dioxide is an absolute essential gas to all human and other species on this and probably all other planets which are home to Carbon-based life. We, on Earth, are actually in need – one might say ‘in desperate need’ – of much more Carbon Dioxide in our atmospheric composition and probably all other physical cycles of existence. At least up to two to four times as much as currently measured levels of the gas imply.
The major disreputable argument of a pseudo-scientific flavour laid against CO2 today, is that it is a ‘supposedly’ Greenhouse Gas responsible for ‘supposedly’ record breaking and fast climbing rises in global temperatures. Neither accusation is true. Planet Earth does not have a ‘Greenhouse’ atmosphere. Never has had and never will have. Earth’s checks and balances and constant cyclic physical processes have never and can never facilitate such moves. They are far too complex for that and are even able to eventually recover from infrequent imbalances caused by the external disruption of cosmic intrusions (at least such as have so far historically occurred).
As for the ‘CO2 causes global heating’ argument, well, take a look at the image below.
This is a combination of two images. The top chart was the very first I used in my arguments against climate hysteria some 18 months ago, after I realised that I – along with everyone else – had been duped by the lies promoting some kind of climate catastrophe. The second chart is one I only recently found.
Realising that they both used a similar time-scale – which I could more or less homogenise by stretching one to match the other – and, by so doing, permit a level of time-comparison previously unavailable to me. Revealing an unprecedentedly (in my personal experience) clear image of the variance between temperature, Carbon Dioxide, and Oxygen, over time, across the most important half-billion years of Earth’s history. The results are quite enlightening.
The first, but perhaps not the most important, thing to note is the apparent reverse synergy between Oxygen and Carbon Dioxide. Apart from the early years of the study time period, when one of these gases rises in volume, the other one falls – and vice versa. This is not so surprising (even to someone of my own only basic understanding of chemistry) when one considers that Carbon Dioxide – a molecule containing two oxygen elements – as it breaks down (the only way in which its level can possibly fall), its constituent elements must go somewhere (they don’t just disappear). So, as CO2 releases one or both of its Oxygen elements, it is likely that Oxygen levels will increase. That is just basic science. The reverse is also true. The patterns of this process in the lower chart are quite remarkable.
One other point of interest from this Oxygen-CO2 ‘interaction’ (I think we can safely call it that since, on the surface at least, the reasons for it are fairly easy to understand) as depicted, is that the points of change in the direction of both gases appears to have some possible link to the ‘Mass Extinctions’ which our planet has undergone. Not always synchronously of course (there are too many factors potentially involved in such processes), but it does appear to be a phenomena having some sort of association with the process, I hope you would agree. On the basis of that, it would appear (though this is somewhat conjectural) that these synchronous extinction events occur in related pairs some 110-120 million years apart and with 50-80 million years between the paired events. This does speak of the possibility of some sort of a perhaps repetition cycle of some 180-190 million years. An idea which poses something of a quandry for our present age…
[I should say at this stage that this was not at all my main reason for beginning this essay. Just something of interest which aroused my attention on the way through.]
…and just to finish off that idea, if what we know of as the ‘Fifth Great Extinction’ – that of the demise of the Dinosaurs at around 65 million years ago – marked the beginning of a possible third pairing – then we are now reaching the outer limits (another 15 million years) of previous paired events, are we not? There has been for some time, among those interested in such things, talk of already being in the throes of the ‘Sixth Great Extinction’. I don’t necessarily believe that myself since, as far as I can ascertain, most if not all previous extinction events occurred not only as a result of some roughly cyclic predilection, but from an externally forced intrusion of cosmic magnitude (which may, of course, have been at least partly cyclic in nature). These things, if pondered seriously, lead to thoughts of the potential danger we may now be facing. A danger which is merely coincidental to our being here at this time and in no case an attributable cause to think we could in any way be to blame for any of it – as we are coercively being led to believe. That does nothing to lessen the potential danger we may face but, in any case, we are powerless to alter events of such magnitude (Elon Musk notwithstanding) if they do materialise. So, there is nothing to worry about. One day we may be here, the next day gone. It doesn’t bear thinking about. But we face that danger every day anyway, from some cause or other, so just don’t think about it. Doing so is just a waste of time.
Anyway, back to the important bit…
…and this is really important. I’m trying to show there is nothing to worry about, or feel guilty about, in relation to the causes of climate change. It’s purely natural.
So, let’s now look at both charts together, the initial main purpose of my doing this at all.
Perhaps the most fallacious of all arguments raised by the climate alarmists is that the daily weather events we now see, are all due to the warming effect of too much Carbon Dioxide acting as a ‘Greenhouse Gas’, and that if CO2 levels are allowed to increase, the planet will continue to get warmer and warmer until it will no longer support higher forms of life. Not only that but that we – modern humanity – are to blame for the bulk of that CO2 increase as a direct result of both ourselves and our billions of cows all farting – plus a few other factors for which we are also to blame. I try to treat this a little light-heartedly because it is nothing but pure, high-grade, Bullshit!
Look at those combined charts, any way you like. They are screaming out about the lies of the climate police. There is not even a slight trace of evidence over the whole half-billion years of recent Earth history, that there is any link whatsoever between levels of CO2 and the global mean temperature as recorded by science.
Go on! Show me a link! I dare you!
And I am confident you can’t, because there is none.
If you are inclined to focus on the extreme right edge of the temperature chart, where a sharp uptick has been placed. The ‘uptick’ added I suppose, by amateurs of the ‘climate police’, as part of the ‘adaptation’ of the original Smithsonian Institute chart (noted at bottom right, below the time scale). That ‘uptick’ supposedly serving to indicate current global temperatures of a little under 60F / 14.5C. An amateurish mistake indeed, because the chart at no other point indicates actual recorded temperatures but a long-term (possibly a 500,000 years moving average of global mean temperatures) which smooths out the readings to enable a line of reasonable thickness to be drawn. In short, the uptick should not even be there because at this scale the most recent moving average figure for global mean temperature stands at a little under 12C – or roughly near the bottom of the line where the uptick begins. It is pure subterfuge to have included that uptick in the chart.
What else can we say, before I finish?
Well, there is the important consideration of polar ice-caps, which I have covered at length elsewhere. Suffice to say that the planet is in charge, not us. If adaptation is required, then we adapt. Or, potentially, we die. A glance at the line in the top chart is all that is needed. We are in an Ice Age. One of the most extensive in the planet’s recent (half-billion years) history. There is no danger of the planet overheating. And little danger (though we are in the right area for it to become one) of over-cooling.
And finally to point out that current levels of atmospheric CO2 are at their lowest level ever, in the whole history of our planet. Take a look at the right end of the CO2 line. We are at, or in the last few million years have been, a low point in atmospheric CO2. Thankfully that is changing in recent years. And yet the unseeing idiots who lead us are incapable of understanding what that means, and are doing their utmost to get us all killed off. And we, most of us, allow ourselves to be led like sheep to the slaughter. Where is the rebellious human spirit when we most need it? Wake up[ fellow humans. You have been duped for long enough.
Long Live Carbon Dioxide. We need Carbon Dioxide. It is the generative source of all life on Earth and the processes in which it is involved produce the Oxygen all Earth creatures need to breathe in order to maintain that life. It is a truism, I think, to say that while only small amounts, varying little over time,but up to two to four times as currently held, need to be included in our atmospheric gases – but huge amounts need to be produced in order to be available for uptake by the processes which produce that life in abundance around the whole planet. That can all happen naturally, while we occupy ourselves with other things, but we must not hide away the CO2 we have. We must not change it into something else. Or we will all die.
Allow the planetary processes of life building – which operate quite well without our aid – take all the CO2 they need to flourish and grow, and all our problems will disappear.
Climate change is quite natural but largely unrelated – and in no way a risk – to any of that. And if it ever becomes such a risk, then it is WE who must adapt – not the planet.
Ok, I have done my block here. I’m tired and lacking sleep, so do not have the patience to check this for errors. It is what it is. Goodnight.
Not Something Else 
Leave a comment