From time to time I have endeavoured to lay out some of my personal views on the ancient history of mankind, much of which history has been coloured by the views and peculiarities of men, mostly men, whose ideas were shaped by what they understood or were told themselves by others. In particular, those views were, in ages dominated by religious thought of one kind or another, biased towards presenting a picture – a natural tendency – in keeping with whatever their own or the preeminent local religion happened to be. There has always been, and still is, a tendency to attribute every aspect of history as having some sort of religious background. Everything the people did, or what we term ‘the gods’ did or said is deemed to have been a matter of worship or adherence or loyalty or feasance to some religious idea. It is only in the present day, when mankind has largely turned away from, or crawled out from under, the dominance of religious thought, that we can see the fallacy in all those stories and in such thought patterns. The ‘gods’ may not have been gods at all, but special people – the remnants of previous local higher civilisations having met their fate, or even ‘drop-ins’ from somewhere else.
The basic thought to emerge from all that is that we urgently need to review all of our history and science in that new light. Removing every trace of such bias as persisted from long ago and up to our own time.
A great deal of information has been passed down to us from our forbears, in writings laboriously created and in forms that have stood the test of time in better and more enduring shape than anything we have to hand on to those who come into whatever future lies beyond our times. Very little of what we have recorded – whether on paper or electronic media – will endure to future generations. So the enduring information from our past will attract so much more value than that which we have ourselves assigned to it. It may be that nothing of modern science will remain and future generations may be left with only the ancient records still extant for them to use and interpret in their own way. It is to be hoped that they will not view everything, as we did, as having some religious context, but taking the information as literal history – the real actions of real people and the real superheroes who were literally their teachers and civilisers, not their gods.
So, I want to continue that occasional foray into ancient history by featuring a version of actual history which I consider to be foundational to our understanding of ourselves and our world. A complete and waterproof story which holds together an entirely feasible picture – the only one that exists – of where we come from and who we are – without any recourse to mythical tales about invisible gods, angels or demons, heaven or hell (by any other names). We came from somewhere as a spark of life, housed in a human body of flesh and bone. It needs to be acknowledged that the chances are that, when this body dies, that spark of life will go somewhere else – perhaps to where it came from. And if that is not the case, well, it doesn’t really matter, does it? Either way, nothing is likely to be determined by how good or bad we were while here, or whether we adhered to some set of ‘rules’ – religious or otherwise – which were held as sacrosanct by whatever authorities persisted in whatever part of the world we were born into. You are as free as you want to be. But in order to understand that, you need to have the whole picture in mind. You need to know the whole picture of where you came from, not the warped version that has been developed through ignorance and distortion over a dark history which has veiled the truth, preventing our full understanding of it. This is the importance I attach to the knowledge I am about to share. And which is in any case freely available if you should choose to seek it elsewhere.
I will feature, in this episode, two videos which will provide the flavour, a mere taste, of what it has now taken around three decades of study for me to build into a picture I can reasonably accept as being close to the our real history as it is possible to currently get. The first video was only released a few days ago as I write this. It gives a general evidenced background of the story which leads to the final eventual departure of most of what we call ‘the gods’ from planet Earth some 2,560 years ago. Their remnants, other than watered down bloodlines, having died out before Alexander the Great’s time.
Everyone, including the good folk at the Ancient Astronaut Archives, seems to fall into the trap of referring to the Anunnaki as ‘deities’. That is quite understandable and, if it aids acceptance in some way, then it can be tolerated as long as we understand it is completely wrong. Gods and deities they were not, but advanced and powerful beings of flesh and blood – much like us, they were.
A sequel to that video will be released in about a week’s time (around the end of 2023) and will deal with when the gods are likely to return. I have previously written, somewhere in these pages, that this will likely be, if it happens at all, between 500-1000 years from now. I can’t wait to see what the video makers have to say on that. I intend to feature that video on its release.
The second video for today comes from South African author, politician, explorer and confirmed eccentric whom I myself dismissed after partially reading his 2012 book ‘Slave Species of the Gods’. But that was at a time when I was trying to form a coherent picture of the times of our Anunnaki creators, his claims seeming to be a little superficial for my tastes. Now, his claims are more in tune with my thoughts as they have matured (or perhaps I have become as crazy as he). But he does seem quite rational in this video with his stories of ancient South African civilisations and gold mining operations. It also fits in nicely with the claims of Sitchin – which forms the basis of much thought and evidence for the Anunnaki heritage. I hope you agree.
Disclaimer:
There is risk associated with featuring topics like this in short videos. That risk is associated with the limited picture such brief features provide. But one has to begin somewhere. I have spent some of the past 30 years building the knowledge base I now have as the structure on which my understanding now rests. I cannot expect much of that understanding to be expressed in a couple of videos. The danger then is that people may, are even likely to, dismiss this without taking any further steps to examine the full subject matter. I will endeavour to ‘fill out’ that picture as best I can in subsequent posts.
My studies initially began with Velikovsky’s limited Jewish centric ideas and then moved on to the Sitchin series of books as the main thesis on the subject. There were insignificant others but Sitchin still forms the major historical basis. Nothing much of value comes from the standard scientific view, for reasons I stated earlier. Scientists should record and tabulate basic facts. They should not interpret or form theories from those facts. Because they, as ill-equipped or personally biased as they are, have been allowed to do that, most scientific theory is just plain wrong or, in many cases, deliberately distorted. This causes many facts to be summarily dismissed or hidden because, while they are patently true, they do not fit the established picture. Resulting in the jumbled narratives and blatant lies within and across many different fields of research we are presented with today.
Not Something Else 