Those buildings have never been rebuilt, except in the form of an Islamic Mosque, sacred to Islam on the site of the destroyed Judaean temple. The was the second temple of Jerusalem. The first having been built by King Solomon around (if I remember right) 900 BCE as one of the first projects of what became the ‘zionist’ cause after settlement of the surrounding conquered lands. That first temple structure was later destroyed, around 700 BCE by Assyrian conquest which led also to the disappearance of ten of the twelve tribes of the israelites into the mists of history – or so it is said – leaving only the tribes of Judah and Benjamin to occupy what became known as Judea (or later in the Roman period as Judaea). It was not long after that episode that these remaining two tribes (as I understand it) also went into captivity, this time by the Neo-Babylonians during the early 6th century BCE. They must have really pissed off their god for that to happen. A real god, incidentally. A person of flesh and blood, not the phantasm of spirit they later dreamed up. I’m not sure if it was still Nannar-Sin at that time, without refreshing my memory, but I know he was still around (they had really long lives, those folk. Many thousands of years. But they were not from this planet [which, incidentally, means that we aren’t, entirely, either – but that’s another story]).
Getting back to my original point about the Roman destruction of that second Judaean temple, which is related to very recent dramatic events, the great gods, they who initiated the original fully human civilisation had, some 600 years before this destruction, left the planet, you might say ‘fled’ the planet, leaving the captive Judaeans free, in the mourning of their fate by the banks of the Euphrates, to concoct a story – based partly on the recorded history of those gods and their sojourn here among us. A story which would suit their (the captives) purposes of providing a background for them to one day take their place and build their supposed heritage in the same land from which they had just been exiled. It involved the invention of a new god. This time an invisible one. Because this time there was nothing to see. No more god of flesh and blood to walk among them and organise their battles. Very convenient. And not only they (now referred to as the ‘Jews’, or ‘zionists’), but later the Christians, and later still the Islamists, all fell for the ruse of the new monotheism. Each stream with their own distinct characteristics.
This is a great story. I accept it, at least I accept the possibility and plausibility of at least some truth contained within it. I, at one time a Christian, also fell for it. Put yourself in the position of those unfortunate captive people, with no apparent hope of salvation, sitting by that foreign river. They had learned people, scribes, who could read and write, and able to study the vast collection of written records in the libraries of the first civilisation, recorded on clay tablets the dictation (in the word’s original sense) of the gods who taught them all aspects of human society, science, mathematics (they were space-farers), music, law, agriculture, etc.. They reasoned an alibi, a sound one, which although it required an element of deep faith, could not easily be disputed by natural reasoning. Its success in capturing the imagination of millions of people, on three separate fronts, now for two to two and a half millennia of zero external contact with higher authority, speaks to that. But to the rest of us it is just another human hoax, with no basis in reality. I mean, if you think about it, can you rationally disagree? But, of course, that is a personal decision and I have no intent to dissuade, ridicule, or disparage anyone who wishes to live their life on the basis of faith. Each to their own personal views. I seek only to provide an alternate viewpoint, to be accepted or dismissed at your own will.
Unfortunately for the zionist cause, that land of Judaea (now covering parts of Turkiye, Syria and Palestine) had, some centuries after the temple destruction, been overrun by the human culture following the long departed local god Nannar, also called Sin, whose planetary association was with the Moon. Many of the council of the great gods were held to be associated with one or other of the planets of our star system. The still remembered symbol of Nannar-Sin was the Crescent Moon. Was this a family emblem associated somehow with their Moon connection? I don’t know, but it has implications further down the line. I am sure you are aware that this same symbol is also chosen as the symbol of one of the three streams of monotheism, which undoubtedly led to the desire of its adherents to construct a working temple of their own design – known today as a Mosque on that same sacred site (equally sacred to them as to others, and on top of all of which is displayed that very symbol). How did that come about? My understanding of it is related below.
One of the last acts of Nannar-Sin, before leaving Earth (remember this is recorded history) presumably as part of the great exit, was to install his son Nabunaid as the last full god ruler of the Neo-Babylonian empire. He passed the leadership to his own son, the Belshazzar of the Bible and the receiver of the prophetic vision of the moving hand, writing on the wall of his great feast. After which, Nabunaid removed himself – actually he was exiled according to cuneiform records – in his old age to Arabia (now part of Northern Saudi Arabia). There, he set up a number of settlements one of which was Medina, where, much later, Mohammed founded Islam.
The global situation we have today, in which are tangled all three of those deeply related Monotheistic religious streams is, I believe, illuminated by this story. That they should all have emanated from the one theme of origins, from a single part of the world, about a single group of advanced beings, tangible, lusty, procreatively active among themselves as well as compatibly with and among our own human forms, producing a mixed bag of gods and demi-gods, is a remarkable insight into an important relationship which has been cloaked in misty secrecy, relegated to focused myth-hood for no appreciable reason than for personal benefit by a minor section of our race over the past 2.5 millennia. This is not a myth but an unforgivable tragedy on the hands of those who have perpetrated the subterfuge for so long and causing the deaths and suffering of millions of people across the centuries. It becomes difficult to consider that as being recognisable human behaviour. And we see it still today, among the zionists and those professing Christianity.
One final word. Though this story contains elements, not all of which I have mentioned, and of which there is much more to tell, some of which may be hard to swallow when first met, it does not rely on those aspects for the most part. I see no difficulty in incorporating such things personally. Things such as space flight and planetary flying objects from around not much less than half a billion years ago. Nuclear weapons from the same time frame, used only once around four thousand years ago and nearly ending the gods reign by their own stupidity (perhaps that is how, earlier, they may have become civilisational ‘remnants’). Ocean going ships. Undersea journeys. Underground realms. The ability to build vast constructions (you don’t still believe the pyramids were built by slaves, do you?). All could just as easily apply to potentially Earthbound remnants of earlier advanced civilisations across the same historic timeframes.
Whether you believe any of this or not, it is an interesting story, which uncannily fits in with what we know of our own, does it not?
Not Something Else 
Leave a comment