You may have noticed that I write more these days on the fallacy of the human logic around climate change. I no longer have a pressing interest in wars and genocides and stuff like that, because from my point of view everything is going well for the world and great changes are under way. Russia and China are winning, backed by most of the sane regions of the world. The West is being shown to be a hollowed out shell, even by its own people, and is in rapid decline. To where! Who cares! So we can largely leave those and other associated things to play out as they must, and end in a much better tomorrow for all of us. Addressing the false notions we have picked up and decided to run with, about climate issues, is the number one objective which should be prime among our endeavours.
I have never understood – well not in recent years, anyway – why humanity wants to live in a desert world without trees. Much like the fictional ‘Dune’ world. I greatly doubt that is what humans actually want, but it is inevitably what they are working towards with the idiotic ‘climate action’ of ‘Net Zero’ carbon emissions they have been convinced by the most evil (or perhaps just the most stupid) of men is what must be achieved. How has this madness come about? And why, if it is so important, is the opposite objective to net zero – that is ‘increased CO2’, occurring. And now, apparently, at a greater rate than ever…
…albeit still at minuscule proportions.
Note: It is impossible for CO2 to rise in the atmosphere at more than minuscule proportions because at a little over one third of one tenth of one percent (0.042% or 0.00042 PPM) of atmospheric content, the air we breathe is already virtually saturated with the stuff. Although that doesn’t sound like much, does it? …and it isn’t very much at all, though it does represent millions of tonnes of gas – gas necessary for the maintenance of all life on Earth. So any excess CO2 generation, after reaching that saturation point, must be absorbed by other processes. Try to imagine what those processes may be. It’s not that difficult – consult a carbon cycle image if necessary (there’s one in the linked story below).
Notice the regular annual breathing of the natural world (the red data line in the image). Across the course of the year, as the seasons turn around, the PPM content of CO2 in the atmosphere alters in a wave-like variance of around 8 PPM. But the good news is that it is still rising – as it needs to do to restore the planet.
So, what happens if CO2 continues to rise? This is a question we must answer, because a) it is rising, and b) there is obviously nothing we can do about that. Nothing, that is, which wouldn’t also prove far too dangerous for ourselves and other planet-sharing life-forms. Fortunately we already have the answer, and it is more good news. The low levels of CO2 prevalent before the industrial revolution and back during the preceding several million years (as low as 280 PPM – correction: 180PPM was the low point) were not the normal levels for our planet – something never mentioned by climate alarmists. You have to go back some 300 million years to again see such low levels. The most common level throughout recent history (that’s the same 300 million years I just spoke about) is between 1000 and 2500 PPM, spending only a few million years below or above that range level. We just happen to have come along (From where, who knows? Well, I do [I think], but that’s for a different day) – at one of those low CO2 times, and so have known no other conditions. Not that that is any excuse for our lax attention to these matters.
So, the fact that so many scientists have also succumbed to the temptation to accept what is a ridiculous concept, is an enduring and ugly scar on their own personal integrity which they may never live down. To suggest that we humans are to blame for the rising CO2 levels – an entirely natural event – and that we must pay through the nose to fight the consequences of our actions – a fight which though billions have already been levied, will produce no results whatsoever (as evidence reveals), indicates the levels of humanity’s stupidity or ignorance and the depths of immorality to which certain of us will sink, has been inconceivable prior to today’s nightmare of life.
And what happens if there is more CO2 generated than the full quota of that gas in the atmosphere, which would be around 2500 PPM (at safe levels) as I said earlier? It could easily exceed that safety level and above 40000 PPM would endanger life on Earth. But let’s just say that it reached 2500 PPM – which is where it was some 50-60million years ago – well, history and science tell us that was when the Earth was at its most productive, in terms of supporting life. So, that would be a good thing, wouldn’t it? The answer is a resounding “Yes”. We, or the planet at least, have been there before. And it was a grand time. THere was no sense of there being a scorching planet in those times. The Earth was at its greenest, and mammalian life flourished. As far as we know there were no deserts at that time.
That was also the period when the modern trend towards climate cooling (still ongoing) began in earnest. We are right now living in a period which is almost the equal coolest our planet has ever been (by average temperatures). But that was also the time when Polar Ice Caps began to form – and they last appeared (except for one brief interlude) 350 million years ago, disappearing 100 million years later.
All of these dramatic facts, and yes thay are all recorded in scientific data – accepted by most ethical scientists – makes the modern climate arguments seem like a shoddy attempt to fool mankind, for some ulterior purpose. Well, that is exactly the case, my friend. You can choose to accept it, or not. The truth will not change. And if everything else is a lie, which it is, it will reveal itself or be revealed in the course of time. Only the propagators of lies need despair. The future will no doubt judge them harshly – as it does with all liars.
Fortunately, it (the nightmare) will not last much longer. CO2 continues to rise. The planet gets continually greener and more productive, to meet our needs (record natural harvests, more leaves-trees-forests, deserts gradually greening), while human societies are being hollowed out and in imminent collapse. We will soon not be able to afford unnecessary and corrupt activities like wars and other hare-brained activities such as EVs and renewable energy. We will instead become more attuned to the land and learned in ways to reap its bounty once again – without machines. There will be no AI future. That is a certainty. A technological collapse will introduce that age. And it is not far away.
Some of what I have said here, though by no means all, but much of the CO2 part, is to be found in this article…
Let´s talk about CO2 increases in 2024 and “collapsing systems” – Climate -Science Press – October 23, 2025
I am not claiming that every number I have used here is entirely accurate. Numbers change over time anyway, but they are as accurate as I can make them from the resources I use to build my own image of climate issues, and they will faithfully serve that purpose. None of that alters the facts as presented.
Not Something Else 
Leave a comment