There is only one thing more dangerous to the world, mankind, and all other living things, than the bald ignorance of climate alarmist agitation. And that thing is the kind of brain-dead, Trumpian stupidity on the climate situation, which refers to it as a ‘Hoax’ for nonsensical reasons.
Alarmist climate theory is a hoax of course, just as much as Donald T’s wet dreams around ‘drill baby, drill’.
We are surrounded by such hoaxes, almost always have been, and not just on climate. Starting with the ‘One God’ hoax, when the Judaic descendants of Abraham realised their at-the-time current god – Baal – was about to or in fact had actually disappeared (around 2,500 years ago – their god had dumped them and they found themselves in captivity in another land – whose historic cuneiform libraries were at their disposal, providing them with the tools to build a whole new supreme ‘One God’ story on the basis of the recorded history of the disappeared ‘real’, and once physically present gods), opening up the opportunity for them to write their own story of history and destiny, based loosely on a corruption of actual events. Subsequently fooling and deluding a large part of the human family with that story of the jealous and invisible ‘One God’ – since they could potentially never again access a real one who actually walked among them and directed their destiny. But that is a story for another time.
Just about any honestly held opinion circulating about our world today, riding on a roll of public, government or commercially invoked popularity is, beneath all the surrounding ‘buzz’, just another hoax, perpetrated by someone of influence with an axe to grind or a cause to push (and the means to push it). And it is damnably hard to judge whether any proffered theory contains more truth than falsehood. History, the more ancient the better (mankind having once had less reason to ‘make shit up’ than under or around today’s twisted mind fudge), and reasonably reliable and fact backed (again the less recent the better) science, are the soundest foundational fields of research for finding least contaminated truth. And talking or listening to people engaged in such fields will ultimately divulge, if that is in fact still possible, the best and most valuable insights into the real way things are. It is a minefield, necessitating much study and levels of verification as it is possible to discover and absorb, in order to gain any valid understanding of what is truly real.
Back to climate…
Donald Trump’s ‘climate hoax’ comments belong to a well-resourced playbook landing on Australia’s shores – ABC News – Sep 29, 2025
I have raised arguments time and time again, annulling both sides of these arguments, having at times been an adherent of both. I am now, correctly I believe, firmly against any form of climate action, any notion of ‘net zero’, or the need for either, seeing – on the basis of true science and history that there is actually nothing wrong or out of place in the current climate of our planet – and, equally firmly, approving of the need, in order for prolonged sustainability of human civilisation, to keep engaged in the use of fossil fuels (including for the production of nuclear power generation), while at the same time not engaging in the ridiculous current but only half-hearted and therefore totally ineffective and needless drive to reduce GHG emissions. There being no such pressing need. In fact, in the case of CO2, there is a great need for more (up to perhaps three times more) of the gas, circulating within and being utilised by our global natural planetary systems, not less. We have been through a period of low CO2 levels over the past several million years, and it is not a pretty sight when viewing the results. Thankfully, the amounts of CO2 available to our natural systems is improving the growth of planetary vegetation and reducing the amount of desert areas. We are already on the right track. We should leave climate alone. The planet knows what it is doing – and it is, in any case, none of our business.
I am not going to provide any evidence in support for my views here, having repeatedly done so in many written pieces on this site in the past. Take a look, but it would be preferable for you to gain your own opinion from the known but largely ignored, pertinent history and science, rather than simply absorbing the views of the deluded masses without checking a single fact from the great body of knowledge available to us. Those who are driving the bad theories of both sides of the climate argument are relying on you not doing that simple research.
I realise this is not a convincing argument in any direction of the offered thoughts. Such is not possible in just a few paragraphs. But that is not what I am seeking. It is more the opening of minds to new or alternative ideas, than to those to which people normally direct their attention. That is a path to more enlightened conversation and broader understanding.
Not Something Else 
Leave a comment