Russia is a big country. Its vast spread encompasses many different climate zones. Russia is also an advanced scientific nation, leading the world in some areas of science. Russia is also a growing economic power, which is increasingly in recent years becoming self-sufficient and therefore more independent from outside influence.
But despite these perceived but also very real advantages, it seems that Russia is lacking in credible background knowledge of climate change. Of course Russia is not alone in that. Most of the world has been hoodwinked into a belief that climate change is a looming disaster about to fall on all of our heads. And yet, despite that perceived threat – and it is only ‘perceived’, there being no reality behind, around, or in front of it, relying as it does on weak and directed computer modelling only (nothing factual) – I repeat, despite that perceived threat, the whole world, not just Russia, has proven totally incapable of getting off its global arses to do anything about the situation – real or imaginary.
We are all prisoners to false opinions on climate. That is, the whole world is held captive to that state of affairs. As an example, in the particular case of Russia (there are plenty of other exampless covering the wider world), is the article I share below, from TASS…
‘Year of 2025 can be among top warmest in history — expert’ – TASS – March 23, 2025
As usual in these things, an expert is quoted. Who the hell is he? Well, the name ‘Research Director of the Hydrometeorological Center of Russia, Roman Vilfand’ is given, which tells us nothing I guess, but further research reveals him to be a very respected and honoured Russian scientist going back into Soviet times. Perhaps that is a clue that he has been in the game far too long. I will say straight out – ‘He should be sacked’ – for being either criminally stupid (a euphemism for being uninformed for the position he holds) or criminally intentioned for disseminating dangerous falsehoods, intended to be falsely backed by that position in order to provide it with a degree of credence. It appears that pretty much all Russian online news sources are repeating the lies. That surprises me, but it would not surprise me if similar western sources also joined in the subterfuge.
I imagine some people may take gross offence at my personal attack on this venerated person, but we are not playing games here. This is a serious situation, involving risk to every living human on the planet. Not to mention future generations. The dangerous falsehoods and outright lies must be stopped. And of course this is a global problem, not a specifically Russian one. It takes only a moment of thought and a bit of confirmatory research to realise the truth in that.
But, regretfully I do realise that this is also such an ingrained attitude of mind – fed across decades now – that it may be an impossible dream to break the spell.
However, allow me to put some ‘meat’ behind my accusations. Here is a short quote…
The probability exists that the year of 2025 will be among the top warmest ones.
The probability also exists that pigs might fly. But there is zero possibility (not probability) that 2025 will be among the top warmest ones. Unless he is talking about prior years this century, of course – but the statement does not state that – and all of which would not vary by more than a single degree Celsius either way. The truth of the matter is that 2025 will undoubtedly be among the coldest of years when viewed in historical context – since the whole planet is now processing through an almost equally coldest period of its history as any other cold period that has preceded it. Which, simply stated, means that the Earth has spent far more of its time far, far hotter than it is today. And that would also hold true if we were to go back only one million years or half a billion of them. I dare any scientist to dispute that.
What’s next?
This is because recent years are becoming increasing warmer under influence of growing concentration of greenhouse gases.
The oldest trick in the game of climate deception. A concept which arose as a result of climate modelling, which arose out of the need to make it look like something dire was brewing in climate systems, which need conveniently arose out of the birth of computer technology. Earth’s atmosphere has not changed, other than marginally since the planet actually formed an atmosphere. The atmosphere is 99.9% formed of only three major gases – Nitrogen, Oxygen, and Argon – none of which can be said to be a GHG (I’m sure you know what that means).
The remaining 0.1% (approximately one tenth of one percent) of the atmosphere (or 1,000 parts per million) consists of several dozen other minor gases, which include Neon, Methane, Helium, Hydrogen, Krypton, Xenon, and many others, the most major one – at 0.03% (300 parts per million, or ppm) – being Carbon Dioxide.
At least that is how it used to be in fairly recent times. CO2 is now, thankfully, up around 500 ppm – or 0.05% of all atmospheric gases (only a very small proportion of that diminutive amount being due to human activity) – presumably by reducing the content of some other of the minor gases in the atmosphere or perhaps eating unnoticeably into the share of one or more of the three major gases. It is worth noting here that the constitutional make-up of any object (Earth’s atmosphere is an object) can, unlike within the flippancy of modern narratives, never exceed 100%.
In the more ancient past (we are talking millions of years), CO2 was up around 2,000 to 3,000 ppm – and that was a time when the planet really blossomed and was at its best and most pleasant. 3,000 ppm is expressed as 0.3% which is three times more than all the current minor gases together, but still only three tenths of one percent of the whole, leaving a whopping 99.6 percent of the whole to the three major gases. You can see, I hope, that this is never going to create a climate catastrophe of any kind and…
‘Anyone who suggests there is a ‘growing concentration of greenhouse gases’, or anything similar to that, is simply “Blowing a GHG (mainly Methane) out of their arsehole”.’ – You can quote me.
Anything else?
Heat transferred from oceans facilitates air temperature growth.
Well, of course it does. No problems there, except the transfer can only take place in that direction if the air is cooler than the water, and such transfers are always, or at least, often going on in one direction or the other all the time. It’s only natural. And this is probably why, this year in particular, as the Northern oceans retained much of their heat over Winter (I’m not sure how that works, but it is not my claim. It is a claim of the expert), with the onset of Spring the warmer waters of the Arctic which retarded the forming of sea ice up there until recent weeks, began losing heat to the atmosphere thus allowing a sudden rush of sea ice building to occur (as witnessed since the second week of March). While I am sure there must be other factors involved, it all seems so relatively simple to me.
I’m not sure there is anything more I could usefully say here.
Except, how long do we have to wait until we hear the penny drop?
Not Something Else 
Leave a comment