Well, this is refreshing, and from a real scientist too.
But before I begin, there is an old English word you must know the meaning of to understand what I am going to say. Now, if you are of similar age to myself, you wouldn’t need that to be defined. It was last used to any great extent, as far as I can ascertain, during the mid 20th century. You know, that time which was full of wars and intrigues, so you needed to know the real ‘griff’ to get any kind of accurate understanding about anything. And real ‘griff’ was not easy to come by. I guess that is still pretty much the same as today too – not least in the realm of climate science. But the original meaning of the word ‘griff’, having now gone out of fashion – as much of the language has – is even harder to come by. There is only one online dictionary I could find, which still carries the only correct definition. See image below. Anything else is pure modern trash.
It seems ‘the real griff’ on climate change and its supposedly disruptive activities to our modern ways of life, is finally clawing its way out from the murky basements that unscrupulous parties like Al Gore tried to bury it in over more than a few decades now. And which many scientists, who should have known better, and who should have followed their own honourable principles, if such they still possess, and also those same principles of the noble profession in which they work, to counter – at great personal risk of course. The same risks as recently seen in the Doctors/COVID debacle, which is still to play out – chiefly in the courtrooms, the hospitals and the morgues of the West. “to counter”… I didn’t complete the sentence before last …to counter the lies and obscurations which were deviously portrayed as truth to the world, its governments and peoples. They needed us all to be involved in their plans for a different and despoiled world.
Be that as it may, and it has to be known that the past few decades through which the perversion of scientific knowledge as portrayed to the non-scientific world has now been cemented into the psyche of the folks of that world to the extent that it remains to be seen whether those impressions can ever be lifted from those minds. It may take a new generation or two for the deeply imbedded mental funk to clear. Little wonder then, that the world is becoming crazier and sicker in mind and body, by the day.
Ok, to the story of the men in white coats: Reasons Why Regulating CO2 Emissions Needs to be Reconsidered – by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D., climatologist, author, and former NASA scientist – Feb 26th, 2025
Again, I would have dearly liked to share this writing in full here, but please read it in situ via the link above. There is so much else on the good doctor’s website, while there, to interest anyone seeking climate truth, or the real griff. Well, as real as it gets at this stage.
I don’t agree 100% with the scientist. He doesn’t see things exactly as I see them, and have endeavoured to explain in this blog over the past 18+ months or so. In particular, he is too much tied to the present to see the whole truth. Scientists should also necessarily first become grounded historicists (I believe that to be the right word for the occasion) before attempting to unravel the mysteries of the present. That would enable them to place the correct level of importance with regard to current events, in light of their acquired knowledge of what has gone before, and of the known bounds within which these things are expected to operate. There is nothing that will happen or can happen, that has not happened before. And in an area of study involving something which moves as slowly as planetary climate flows, it is imperative to know what happened before, over appropriate time cycles involving from mere thousands to hundreds of millions of years. Nothing of which can be completely ignored, lest we end up with the confusion we see in today’s world, arising from poorly or hastily thought out conclusions.
Not Something Else 