[I began this writing several weeks ago but dropped it for other pressing matters. But I feel the subject is of such importance that I have now completed it.]
That ‘Humanity’ is to blame, for almost everything going wrong on planet Earth, is a recurring theme in modern thought, with focused intensity embodied within the subject of ‘climate change’ it seems. A ruse or meme for which there is little in the way of real evidence when viewed seriously and without imbedded or established prior conclusions, and yet pursued with vigour and almost religious fervour in its condemnation of human cultural activity.
I will seek to avert or dispel such condemnation through informed writing, both new and relatively recent, from the pages of the RIA Novosti online news journal – which makes available serious reporting of current matters of interest in the information sphere. That journal is not, however, the best source of up-to-the-minute news, the immediacy of which can vary considerably across each 24-hour news cycle in today’s fast changing world situation. So I tend to spend much of my research time in other quarters, therefore potentially missing some important stories – one of which I feel is worthy of bringing to your attention, and from which the title of this piece is drawn.
But first a very recent example of the type of writing which is not conducive to correct thinking on climate related issues…
“Russia is already losing territory”: an unexpected consequence of Trump’s victory – RIA Novosti – Nov 17, 2024
This very recent article is simply a regurgitation of all the usual climate change nonsense we are being continuously asked to re-swallow. I’m sure Russia will not miss very much a small ice-island which has disappeared but which will inevitably soon reform again. These things which are seen as current threats from climate change will soon lose their perceived importance and fade from memory as the planet continues to cool.
And now for the real stuff. The following article centres on the biggest lie of all the lies surrounding current climate conditions. That is that we, yes us humans, are responsible for perceived – and not necessarily real – alterations in Earth’s general climate position. It is possible that we may have induced a small amount of that change as a result of modern life activities, but not sufficient to make any difference to the overall picture. We kid ourselves if we think otherwise. We may actually be beneficially contributing to saving the planet by the very same activities of which we are being accused of causing hurt to it. The world, the physical world, the world in which we actually live and by whose graces alone we have existence, in fact (which means ‘in reality’) needs much more atmospheric CO2 to make it thrive again.
“The person is not to blame”: what Russian scientists have learned about the climate – RIA Novosti – Jan 14, 2023
How much more CO2 is necessary? At least twice and possibly up to three or four times as much. That means at least 1,000 ppm (parts per million) and up to 1,500 or even 2,000 ppm. These are the normal constituencies of CO2 in Earth’s atmosphere, which became diminished to around 180 ppm over a period of tens of millions of years to dangerously low levels (fluctuating between 180 to 300 ppm) in the previous 800,000 years, but which are now, hopefully, beginning to recover back to normal levels – with or without our assistance or hindrance. The ‘now’ in the previous sentence was not 1850 or the beginning of industrial activity as often supposed, but at what is glibly called the end of the last ice-age, around 17,000 years ago. We are of course still in that ‘last ice-age’ which began some 50 million years in the past.
To emphasize the seriousness of our world’s CO2 situation and the idiocy with which it is being treated by subversive elements of authority and now even the general public of many nations as a result of ignorance of the facts, I want to provide a quote from a 2017 article by Dennis Avery (of whom I know very little, but like what he says – although the last sentence is unverified)…
Our crop plants evolved about 400 million years ago, when CO2 in the atmosphere was about 5000 parts per million! Our evergreen trees and shrubs evolved about 360 million years ago, with CO2 levels at about 4000 ppm. When our deciduous trees evolved about 160 million years ago, the C02 level was about 2200 ppm—still five times the current level.
There’s little danger to humans of too much CO2 in the air they breathe. The EPA says 1000 ppm is the safe limit for lifetime human exposure. The CO2 alarm in nuclear submarines is set at 8,000 ppm, and space shuttles often get to 5,000 ppm.
‘When Too Little CO2 Nearly Doomed Humanity’ – Dennis Avery – Jun 04, 2017
Repeating the final sentence from that article – “Is the long, wrong- headed war against CO2 finally fading?”, I can say… “No, it isn’t”. And while the knowledge is readily available to all who care to enquire, even nearly seven years later, the brain-washing is still going on at full pace. The better question now would be “Will the long, wrong- headed war against CO2 ever fade?” Well, yes, it will. The matter is, in any case, not in our hands. As the planet continues to cool and CO2 to rise, the falseness of the argument will become undeniable. And the foolishness of its proponents finally revealed.
Finally, another good article from RIA Novosti, fairly closely related to the subject and, I would say, containing information which is not widely known…
Oceans will disappear: when and how Russia will unite with America – RIA Novosti – Oct 13, 2022
Happy reading, for the new year.
Not Something Else 
Leave a comment