Once again I must enter the battle field to advance the cause of CO2, so cruelly and erroneously blamed as chief instigator of the Global Warming attributed to the need for alarmist led action to ‘fight’ Climate Change. The perpetrators of this confusion being the Global Swindlers who want you to “Follow the Swindle’ – their swindle, rather than ‘Follow the Science’. And who is, or was, maybe some years ago now, the chief agitator for the Swindle – none other than the lying bastard – Al Gore (as seen in the video below).
The Swindlers have all new top quality modern video and other weapons to prod you into accepting or continuing to accept their lies, while all I have to do battle with is some old film and a few relevant diagrams. But I am bound to win, because I also have logic and truth.
The basic theme of this X video is that CO2 rise follows rather than precedes periods of warming temperature, and therefore cannot be seen as the cause of that warming. This is true. I mean, logically it can be no other way. I mean, you can see that in the old graphs Gore is interpreting the wrong way round. His position, whether his qualifications back that up or not, allow him to make statements diametrically opposed to the facts. That’s not science. That’s swindle.
The film, in its final statement, says something like, and this is a very pertinent question: “But if CO2 doesn’t drive our climate, what does?” And then it ends, leaving you high and dry. That’s where I come in.
And the answer to that question is equally as obvious as Gore’s lies. Lies which, incidentally, are not supported by science and have never been made by scientists. Scientists have always known the truth of the matter, while their august administrative bodies on the other hand – the money rakers – aided by superstar political worms like Gore, tend to be the issuers of conjured ‘scientific’ statements, tailored to say whatever various power centres may wish to be heard. If you are a westerner and you are awake, you are familiar with that kind of business direction, surely? And if you are not a westerner you have probably never been troubled by such nonsense. Think yourself lucky.
Earlier in the film it is stated that water plays a big part in global warming, and certainly it does. That is just logical. And it does so by many more times whatever influence humans can possibly contribute to the issue. There are far more square kilometres of ocean surface, and volume, than all the motor vehicles, farm animals, mining and manufacturing centres, and whatever other sources of human origin could ever jointly compete with as a major source of climate driving potential. Humans actually contribute no more than 1% of all ongoing climate drivers. Climate change was active long before we came along, and we kid ourselves if we think there is even the slightest possibility that we could make a difference to nature’s way of conducting planetary balance or imbalance. We are conceited monkeys, perhaps even molluscs, by comparison.
I don’t want to say any more, but I must, as this is such a trivial but stubborn matter which has been driven relentlessly into human minds by programmed illusion.
Yes, it is the oceans, mostly, due to their size, but also the lands, both of which are sources of both methane gas and CO2, released by natural means and the rises and falls of Earth’s natural rhythms, into the atmosphere. But the content of CO2 and methane together in the atmosphere, represents far less than 1% of atmospheric gases – in fact less than one half of one tenth of 1%. Methane, chemical name CH4, exists in far smaller quantities than CO2. They don’t usually coexist, but rises in methane have historically preceded rises in temperature and as the gas breaks down, it forms – among other things – CO2 at about 20 times the volume of CH4 present. This is a drawn out process covering around a century or so, with the methane eventually disappearing and leaving large quantities of CO2 – which also degrades into other gases or is consumed by ground level processes – the whole process continually being repeated, not in cycles (as far as I am aware) but in waves, as instigated by other external and internal Earth processes – not all of which are regular.
All life on Earth depends on the continuity of this CH4 – heating – CO2 – cooling process. Without it, we and all other living things die. And we, like the utter fools we undoubtedly are, have allowed ourselves to be convinced of the need for net-zero human emissions of that vital gas. We are controlled idiots. Especially when it is properly considered that our contribution to the process is so minimal as to be justly ignorable.
One last thing. The CH4 to CO2 and the intermingled heating to cooling processes are not necessarily in any way linked, and neither are regular. Sometimes taking place together, sometimes not. The drivers of both, I have now come to think, are related to the ‘external’ (Sun [solar emissions], Cosmic entity [rocks, comets, or other events far away]) or ‘internal‘ (volcanic, plate movement, etc.), Earth processes, rather than, to a large extent anyway, the influence of atmospheric gases. Its a complicated physical world we live in, but it has been stable (more or less) for far longer than we have been here. And if you check carefully, it obviously is set to run within set boundaries – some of which we have not yet encountered and perhaps would not survive. Does that matter? Not a bit. Can we do anything about that? Not a chance. But there is nothing on the horizon or even far beyond it, that would present a valid reason to worry. Just enjoy the life you have been given, while you can.
Have I convinced you? I doubt it. Then die you fools, DIE.
Not Something Else 
Leave a comment