Expressing Anti-Zionist and Anti-Israel Thoughts – Verbally or in Writing – is Not Antisemitism (whatever that word actually means)

That has now been legally proven under British Law in the case of Professor David Miller – a decision which I think (though I am no lawyer) may hold up in most Western legal systems at least. It makes sense.

So I am free to express my long-held view – something I have already done on numerous occasions – that the state of Israel should never have been allowed to exist, let alone be granted statehood within the United Nations. I call for that state to be rescinded and its lands to become part of the single state of Palestine with full UN recognition. And that Jerusalem, all of Jerusalem, be recognised as its capital. That is not going to happen, I know. The world is not even thinking along those lines, generally, just now, so what is the alternative? Well, military destruction of the state apparatus is one – something which is ongoing thanks to Iran. But, I think Iran will never go sufficiently far as to ‘destroy’ the state. At least not without sufficient provocation. And, thanks to the US, Israel is a nuclear armed state which could devastate a large area of West Asia as they go down. One thing is clear, they must be stopped somehow, because what is less clear is whether the world can ever know peace while that state exists.

I had never before seen the legal arguments which could form the proper basis for a decisive move against the state of Israel, but thank Amarynth at Chronicles: Sovereign Global Majority for putting together the following article on the subject.

The State of Israel’s Statehood at the UNGA – Aug 9, 2026

I can add nothing more at this stage, but you must already be aware that a lot of important history is being added to the human story in the days and months during which we are now privileged witnesses. All things are now subject to change, perhaps without much prior notice. To watch, and to keep up, is to perhaps better understand.

---