While I am sure that many would attempt it, there is actually no-one who could successfully raise a fact-based, logically sound argument against that premise.
If the West, led by America, has its way, the planet we now live on will be turned into a vast prison system where numbers will be forcefully kept down to only sufficient slaves to adequately produce the resource needs of the ruling elite. There is only one nation, possibly assisted by a few others, that stands solidly in the way of the realisation of such a nightmare. That nation is Russia.
This would more than adequately explain the exuberant posturing and rabid polemic (mostly false) railed against the Russian Federation by Western government and media alike in recent times. And, of course, the vast sums the West is prepared to spend (a loosely defined term for ‘raise debt to buy’) on military manpower and munitions to back up (another loosely defined term for ‘use coercively in a threatening way or for sabre-rattling maneuvers’) their attacks on Russia.
So, what does this mean? What action will Russia take? What does the West expect Russia to do? Capitulate? Surrender? Accede to the West’s expectations to rule the world and shape it as it sees fit? Or call the West’s bluff, as being only a fanciful notion? Steel its reserve for possibly bolder moves by the West? How far is Russia prepared to go to preserve its identity?
Someone has already written about this, and no, I don’t mean George Orwell, someone more recently, in the last few days. And someone else has collaborated to translate that into English to help inform us poor citizens of the West – if we are willing to listen. You will find this enlightening or simply confirmatory (to already held thoughts) article here: ‘Why Russia Has No Right To Surrender To The West’, or as Google Translate would put it (from the original): ‘Why Russia Does Not Make Sense To Capitulate To The West’
I will entrust to readers intelligence what they make of that, but I will just make a couple of further statements. One is that I don’t believe, even for a second, that Russia, under President Putin (and for as long as he holds the reins), has any intention of capitulating to the West in any way whatsoever. I believe he has made that abundantly clear. The West then has two main options:
- Continue the overt baiting and demonisation of Russia while waiting for, and covertly working towards, a more opportune moment for a takeover/capitulation. The downside to this plan is that such a moment may never happen.
- Push for a flare-up (actually ‘keep’ pushing for a flare-up, since provocation is one of their main games) that will ensure and in their own minds justify a move to open armed conflict, relying on their massive military to somehow bungle and bruise its way to gaining them a superior position (not hopeful, based on their past record – Russia is not Iraq). The downside of that unlikely outcome is that they could easily end up with nothing – a pyrrhic victory. President Putin has already made it abundantly clear that, and I paraphrase, “If there is to be no Russia, there will be no ‘anywhere’.” – and he, of all people, has the power to make that happen.
So, where does the ‘worse than Nazis’ thing come into this? Well, you wouldn’t be asking that question if you had read the linked article.
But, stepping back a little, is this all leaning too much on the worrying side? Did Solzhenitsyn have the West truly pegged? Or should we all be ‘ready to die’?